Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 5, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Humboldt District Court. — Hon. D. F. Coyle, Judge. Indictment for adultery. Trial. Verdict of guilty and sentence, from which defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.

The defendant, at the time charged in the indictment, to wit, on or about the 1st day of September, 1911, was the keeper of a boarding house at Humboldt. On different occasions F. W. Dietz, with whom she is charged with having committed adultery, was a visitor at her home, and various witnesses testified to having seen them together at different times, and at least one witness other than Peterson, whose testimony we will later notice, testified to having seen them kiss each other. Dietz was married in 1894, and this prosecution was commenced by his wife.

1. Criminal law: adultery: evidence. I.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. State v. SchaedlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. State v. TrachselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KulandNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. State v. SimsIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. DietzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Preston v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Armstead v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API