Legal Opinion
Kleiman v. Kleiman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1993No. 89-CV-955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Louis A. Kleiman and his attorney, Ted Kavrukov, appeal from an order of the trial court requiring them to pay attorney’s fees in the amount $17,928.00 to appel-lee, Carolyn R. Kleiman, and for appellant Kleiman to pay her $3,149.35 as costs as sanctions under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 11. The trial court ruled that appellants violated Rule 11 by filing an amended complaint seeking to enforce the terms of a property settlement agreement entered by the Kleimans which was incorporated, but not merged, in their final judgment of absolute divorce. The trial court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Brubaker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lowrey v. GlassmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Goldschmidt v. Paley Rothman Goldstein Rosenberg & Cooper, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bredehoft v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Schwartz v. Franklin National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.