Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2004No. 03-10070; D.C. No. CR-00-00527-EHCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant-Appellant Isaías Mendoza (“Mendoza”) pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), or illegal re-entry after deportation. He later sought to withdraw his plea, alleging that ineffective assistance of counsel led him to plead guilty. The district court denied the motion and Mendoza appealed. Because we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The parties are familiar with the factual and procedural background of this case, so we recount it only as necessary to explain our reasoning. Mendoza entered his guilty plea with a court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Totten v. MerkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Walter David TallmadgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mendoza, AKA Vizcarra-Zamora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API