Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Berkeley

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1976No. Civ. 37475PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

This action involves a constitutional attack by plaintiff, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereinafter “PG&E”) upon section 605 of the Berkeley Election Reform Act of 1974. That section prohibits any “proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, syndicate, business trust, company, corporation, or labor union” from making a contribution to “any candidate or committee.” Elsewhere in the act, the word “committee” is defined as “any person or combination of persons 1 that directly or indirectly receives contributions or makes expenditures or contributions for the purpose of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barnes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API