Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Berkeley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
This action involves a constitutional attack by plaintiff, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereinafter “PG&E”) upon section 605 of the Berkeley Election Reform Act of 1974. That section prohibits any “proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, syndicate, business trust, company, corporation, or labor union” from making a contribution to “any candidate or committee.” Elsewhere in the act, the word “committee” is defined as “any person or combination of persons 1 that directly or indirectly receives contributions or makes expenditures or contributions for the purpose of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Barnes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.