Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 11, 1936No. Docket No. 66350Published

The Board has jurisdiction and, when a petition is filed, it is its duty to review the administrative action of the Commissioner in determining a deficiency and penalties. It is not relieved of this duty by the fact that, in a criminal proceeding, the taxpayer was sentenced to pay and did pay the amount determined as the tax by the court.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY H. EPSTEIN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Epstein v. Commissioner

Docket No. 66350.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

34 B.T.A. 925; 1936 BTA LEXIS 628;

August 11, 1936, Promulgated

The Board has jurisdiction and, when a petition is filed, it is its duty to review the administrative action of the Commissioner in determining a deficiency and penalties. It is not relieved of this duty by the fact that, in a criminal proceeding, the taxpayer was sentenced to pay and did pay the amount determined as the tax by the court.

George Walter Smith, Esq., for the petitioner.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Epstein v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API