Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Friel v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 2012No. 2011-CA-1032Published

1Concurrence

LOVE J.,

concurs and assigns reasons.

_jjl respectfully concur with the majority. However, I write separately to emphasize the minimal standards required to surpass an exception of no cause of action. “The exception of no cause of action determines whether, based on the facts alleged in the four corners of the petition, the law affords the plaintiff a remedy.” Jenkins v. Gray Ins. Co., 11-0035, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/06/11), 67 So.3d 707, 709. The pertinent question is whether, in the light most favorable to plaintiff and with every doubt resolved in plaintiffs behalf, the petition states any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Becnel v. GrodnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. State, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning & Control v. Infinity Surety Agency, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  3. Mendonca v. Tidewater, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Jenkins v. Gray Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API