Mounts v. State

ON state’s motion for rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The State has filed a motion for rehearing in which it is insisted that the question upon which the reversal is predicated should not be given that effect.

As supporting such position the State cites Graver v. State, 172 S. W. (2d) 316; Sanders v. State, 132 Tex. Cr. R. 466, 104 S. W. (2d) 864; Alexander v. State, 8 S. W. (2d) 176; Booth v. State, 90 Tex. Cr. R. 240, 234 S. W. 888; Ard v. State, 101 Tex. Cr. R. 545, 276 S. W. 263; Jenkins v. State, 175 S. W. (2d) 83. These cases when considered in connection with those cited in our…