Legal Opinion

Manhattan Gear & Instrument Co. v. 2350 Linden Blvd. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to compel specific performance of an option for the purchase of real property, defendants appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 22, 1966, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed specific performance. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied, and summary judgment directed dismissing the complaint. The option agreement, contained in the lease of certain premises to plaintiff, provided that plaintiff “ within three (3) years from the date of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Noble v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Noble v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Von Arx, A. G. v. BreitensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. T.I.P. Holding No. 2 Corp. v. WicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Swiss Bank Corporation and O'COnnOr Investments v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companies v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API