People v. Marinus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The County Court properly denied that branch of the defend*678ant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the statements he gave to law enforcement officials on July 1, 2007, and July 11, 2007. The credibility determinations made by the County Court after a suppression hearing are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]; People v Spann, 82 AD3d 1013, 1014 [2011]; People v Smith, 77 AD3d 980, 981 [2010]; People v Leggio, 305 AD2d 518, 519 [2003]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ChanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
- People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. Shakeem B.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.