Legal Opinion

Bohenko v. Grzyb

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 11, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Could a jury reasonably have found that the defendant, Richard Grzyb, was negligent in failing to keep a light on at the unlocked rear entrance to his home in Dudley at 1:00 a.m. on Sunday, August 24, 1980? Considering the evidence at trial from a perspective most favorable to the plaintiff, Rita Bohenko, we answer that question in the negative. We, therefore, reverse *962the judgment entered for Bohenko after a special jury verdict finding Bohenko and Grzyb each fifty percent causally negligent, the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence of negligence having been properly raised by a motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Morong v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Murphy v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sweet v. CieslakMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Wilson v. CopenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. McKinnon v. CollinsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API