Legal Opinion

Satele v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2019No. S248492PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Corrigan, J.

*855 Petitioner, William Tupua Satele, asked the superior court to release ballistics evidence for expert testing in preparation for filing a habeas corpus petition. The court denied the request under the authority of **702 Penal Code section 1054.9, which governs discovery in habeas corpus proceedings involving certain judgments, including a sentence of death. Specifically, the court found that Satele had failed to show good cause to believe his access to the evidence was reasonably necessary to obtain relief, as the statute requires. The trial court erred. Section 1054.9's good cause…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ashley Judd v. Harvey WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. AARON KILLGORE V. SPECPRO PROFESSIONAL SERVICESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Bird Rock Home Mortgage v. Breaking GroundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Garcia v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Guerrero v. HestrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API