Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Village of Beaver City

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2007No. S-06-874PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

In 2005, the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act was amended to include a provision that “[a]n action may be dismissed by the plaintiff, if represented by legal counsel, without prejudice to a future action, before the final submission of the case to the compensation court.” Linda L. Knapp, through her attorney of record, filed for, and was granted, a dismissal without prejudice 1 day before trial of her case in the Workers’ Compensation Court. We agree with the compensation court that she had a statutory right to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

Knapp filed a petition against the Village of Beaver City,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Watson v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. ALEGENT HEALTH BERGAN MERCY MED. v. HaworthNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. HalfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Grady v. Visiting Nurse Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Money v. FlowersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Interiano-Lopez v. Tyson Fresh MeatsNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Adoption of Kailynn D.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Niemoller v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rohde v. City of OgallalaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API