Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Selbest Dress, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1951No. 14313PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The suit below was on verified account for balance of $2,951.82 admittedly due on the trial, subject to defendant Ginsberg’s claim of offsets by way of cross-action. Following a jury verdict, appellee as plaintiff recovered judgment in amount sued for and interest, with resultant appeal.

The affirmative matters pled in aforesaid cross-action are sufficiently reflected in jury issues and answers, viz.: (1) That some of the dresses shipped by Sel-best Dress, Inc., to Ginsberg were defective; (2) the dresses returned by Ginsberg to Selbest were not returned for the purpose of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flack v. First Nat. Bank of DalhartTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Robert McLane Co. v. Swernemann SchkadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Adkins-Polk Co. v. John Barkley & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Mueller v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  2. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Vaughn v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Bohon v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Hood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API