Legal Opinion

Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 1, 1960No. 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

This case involves the distribution by the officer of the proceeds received from a foreclosure sale on a conditional vendor’s lien. We are concerned with the first two sentences of 9 V.S.A. §1695 which read as follows: “The proceeds of such sale shall be applied to the payment of the lien and the costs and expenses of keeping the property and sale. The balance shall be paid on demand to the vendee or the person holding under him.” So our question here is, did the constable turn over the balance of the proceeds to “a person holding under” the conditional vendee?

In the last analysis, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Parker v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Hatch v. LamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. Audette v. GreerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  3. Swanton Village v. Town of HighgateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  4. Burke Mountain Recreation, Inc. v. Vermont Development Credit Corp. (In Re Burke Mountain Recreation, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API