Johns v. State

Beck, Presiding Justice.

1. The court did not err, under the evidence relating to the impartiality of a juror in holding that he was competent.

2. Nor did the court err in holding competent certain other jurors put upon the defendant. These jurors were challenged for cause on the ground that they had served on the traverse jury at the October term, 1933, of Charlton superior court. The trial under review took place at the March term, 1934. Besides, it is not alleged that the county wherein this trial took place did not fall within the provisions of the act of August 19, 1911, relating to the…