Legal Opinion
Ryder v. Lacey
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 9, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. J3uit by Edgar S. Ryder and others against Elmer B. Eacey. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
[1] This claim of this patent to Harder, No. 627,732, and issued June 27, 1899, was the subject of consideration by this court in Ryder v. Townsend (C. C.) 188 Fed. 792, decided April 1, 1911, and by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (Ryder v. Schlichter, 126 Fed. 487, 491, 61 C. C. A. 469, 473), and in both cases the claim was held valid and infringed. In Ryder et al. v. Beaver Silo & Box M. Co. (no opinion filed) January 23, 1912, Judge A. E. Sanborn followed these cases and granted a preliminary injunction. I am not aware of any decision to the contrary.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ryder v. SchlichterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Ryder v. TownsendU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ryder v. Beaver Silo & Box Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1914
- Farmers' Handy Wagon Co. v. Beaver Silo & Box Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1914