Legal Opinion

Randolph State Bank v. Osborn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 12, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

De Graee, J. —

The note in suit is a renewal note, in the sum of $575, dated October 16, 1924, and payable to plaintiff-bank. The original note signed by these defendants was executed September 4, 1922. "John Arterburn did n°t- personally sign the renewal note, but his name was signed by his wife, Dena. By amendments to the answer it is alleged that, at the time of the execution of the original note, it was orally agreed by and between the signers and the payee-bank that Osborn, the principal, was to sell his house, and that all money received from the sale in excess of the mortgage should be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. GriebelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Banwart v. ShullenburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. National Bank of Decorah v. RobisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. State Savings Bank v. DealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kruse v. WickhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API