Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Penfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dickey

This is assumpsit, upon a promissory note made by appellants, payable to appellee. The bill of exceptions in the case shows that, with the declaration, plaintiff-filed his own affidavit, stating “that the above named defendants are truly and justly indebted to him, after allowing all claims and set-offs whatever, in the sum of $140.40, said indebtedness being in the nature of one promissory note, given October 20, 1874, and due May 15, 1875, with ten per cent interest.”

Defendants filed a plea of non assumpsit, but filed no affidavit of merits. On motion of plaintiff, the court entered a rule…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beckers v. City of KankakeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  2. Spengler v. EigerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  3. Pioneer Furniture Co. v. LangworthyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Silliman v. NowlanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API