Legal Opinion

Beckman v. Southern Pacific Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1911No. 2228PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Eon. J. A. Eowell, Judge. Action by William Beckman against tbe Southern Pacific Company. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

This was an action for damages for injury to sbeep at Reno, Nev., while in transit from Ogden, Utah, to San Francisco, Cal.

The material allegations respecting respondent’s delict are as follows: “That the defendant, disregarding its duty to provide proper, safe, adequate, and sufficient stockyards, carelessly and negligently furnished unsafe, broken down, inadequate stockyards, and carelessly and negligently failed to provide a guard or watchman for said stockyards, so that, *474by reason of tbe carelessness and negligence of the defendant aforesaid, during the nights of March 1st and 2d, dogs or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lane v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Houghtelin v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API