Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Dmytreshin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Industrial Commissioner appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, holding, contrary to the initial determination of the Commissioner, that claimant had worked in a covered employment in New York and was qualified for benefits. Claimant was employed by the New York office of the employer as a “ layout ” man. The employer was engaged in a nationwide business of designing, redesigning and planning machine layouts for any concern that engaged its services anywhere in the United States. Claimant was not hired for any particular job, but was hired generally to perform…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heller v. International Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Walco Leasing v. BilichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In re the Claim of La FranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API