Legal Opinion

In Re SPRAYBERRY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Branch, Judge.

While Lauren King Sprayberry was appearing as counsel at a motions calendar in a trial court, her cell phone began to vibrate. The trial court held her in criminal contempt and imposed a fine of $25. On appeal, Sprayberry argues that she was not afforded an opportunity to be heard and that the evidence did not support the judgment. We agree with the first of these contentions and therefore reverse.

“[T]he contempt power is inherent in every court and, as such, is not subject to abridgement or restriction by the Legislature.” In re Jefferson, 283 Ga. 216, 217 (657 SE2d 830)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bradley v. State ex rel. Solicitor-GeneralSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Dowdy v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Garland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. In Re JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Williams.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. In Re Francys JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
  3. Rubie Hillman v. Aldi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API