Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 4, 1993No. 11604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to sell a narcotic substance by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a)1 and 21a-278 (b).2 The defendant claims *844that the trial court (1) should have instructed the jury concerning the defendant’s drug dependency, and (2) should have excluded evidence concerning the defendant’s arrest in Maryland for possession of cocaine and a firearm. We agree with the defendant’s first claim and, therefore, need not reach the second.

The jury could reasonably have found…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. LucaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. State v. McNeilConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BryanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API