Legal Opinion

State v. Abbott

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 3, 2003No. 88,603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Michael Abbott appeals his conviction after a bench trial on stipulated facts to one count of possession of mefhamphetamine with intent to sell and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. Abbott argues that officers conducted an illegal search, insufficient evidence existed linking him to the drug paraphernalia found in the van, and the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

The parties stipulated to the facts below. The question is whether the facts rise to a violation of protections afforded under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. State v. MayberrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. State v. SaleemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. UnruhCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API