Legal Opinion

Mann v. Mann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1971No. 54272PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker

Continental Casualty Company (hereinafter “Continental”) appeals from the entry of a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs for $63,392.26. Plaintiffs had recovered a judgment against defendant, an attomey-at-law, for alleged negligence in the performance of his duties as their counsel. Plaintiffs then instituted garnishment proceedings against Continental which had written a professional liability insurance policy in favor of defendant. Subsequently summary judgment was entered against Continental, from which it appeals.

We summarize the facts based on the pleadings, affidavits,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sims Ex Rel. Ruark v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. McFadyen v. North River InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Country Mutual Insurance v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Barkhausen v. NaugherIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Shapiro v. DiGuilioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Coregis InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Bank of Waukegan v. FreshleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1976
  3. Continental Cas. Co. v. Coregis Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Coregis Insurance Co. Modified on Denial of Rehearing Nunc Pro Tunc to Mar. 31, 2000Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API