Point Gratiot Sand v. Hartford Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Action upon a policy of fire insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeleb, J.
This action is brought to recover upon a policy of fire insurance.
On the 20th of September, 1910, the defendant insurance company issued to the plaintiff its policy of insurance, whereby it insured the plaintiff against loss by fire to the steam tug ■WarnicJc.
On the 22d of December, 1910, the tug was totally destroyed by fire, and this action is brought to recover upon the policy.
The defendant contests its liability on the ground that at the time the policy was issued the plaintiff was not the unconditional and'sole owner of the property insured, and the policy under its terms was, therefore,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Draper v. Oswego County Fire Relief Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- McCoy v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Weed v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Sewell v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Robbins v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glessner v. Neshannock Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Meade v. North Country Co-Operative InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1985