Legal Opinion

People v. Sedlock

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2007PublishedCited by 23 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the People presented defendant with sufficient notice of the nature of the accusation by delineating in the information a seven-month time period dur ing which the alleged criminal act occurred. We hold that, under People v Morris (61 NY2d 290 [1984]) and People v Watt (81 NY2d 772, 774 [1993]), the People have failed to show that an allegation of so broad a time frame was necessary under the circumstances presented in this case.

Defendant, a funeral director and scoutmaster for a Boy Scout troop, was arraigned on one charge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KeindlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. BeauchampNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. WattNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. ClevenstineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. JabotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. IrvineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. RozarioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API