Legal Opinion

Anthony Mills v. Arlene Bluth

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 27, 2026No. 4:26-cv-00017Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PECOS DIVISION ANTHONY MILLS, § Plaintiff, § § v. § PE:26-CV-00017-DC-DF § ARLENE BLUTH, § Defendant. § U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiff Anthony Mills’s proposed Complaint and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (Docs. 1, 2). This matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge through a standing order of referral pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

and Appendix C of the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges. After due consideration, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Atakapa Indian de Creole v. State of Louisiana, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API