Legal Opinion
Wayside Farm, Inc. v. Bowen
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 27, 1988No. C88-3744APublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the plaintiffs motion for prelimi*1358nary injunction. On October 13, 1988 the Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order primarily on the basis that the plaintiff failed to show any likelihood of success on the merits. (Docket # 10).
The plaintiff has filed a supplemental brief in support of the preliminary injunction with the Court. (Docket # 11). The government has opposed the motion and filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.