Legal Opinion · Dissent

Truetried Service Co. v. Hager

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1997No. 70163Published

1DissentSara J. Harper, Presiding Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the trial court’s ruling. The majority contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that commercial impracticality was a bar to the enforcement of the commercial lease. The majority’s conclusion rests on the accepted principle in Ohio that caveat emptor applies to all commercial leased premises and, therefore, there is no implied warranty that premises are suited for a particular purpose in a lease agreement. According to the majority, under these circumstances, the lessee carries the burden of resolving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Myers v. GarsonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Makranczy v. GelfandOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Shore, Shirley Co. v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API