Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Prendergast

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Washington county, McGluer, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.1

Action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The contract was executed August 5, 1876, and by its terms the purchase-money was to be paid, and the deed delivered, in one year from that date; the two being concurrent and dependent. May, 1883, plaintiff offered to pay the purchase-money, with interest, and demanded a conveyance; but defendant Prender-*302gast refused to accept the money or make a deed. This action was .commenced April, 1887. The contract was wholly executory, and there is no allegation that the time of performance had ever been ex- • tended.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coolbaugh v. RoemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Martin v. HurlbutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pike Rapids Power Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Shelly v. MikkelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Noyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Blunt v. EgelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API