Legal Opinion

Almanzar v. Rivera

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 2004Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

The defendant was defaulted, pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 33, for failing to answer interrogatories. The plaintiffs thereafter requested a hearing to assess damages. On the day of the scheduled hearing, the defendant called the motion judge’s attention to the demand for a jury trial he made in connection with his answer to the plaintiffs’ complaint, and asserted his right to a jury trial on the question of damages. The motion judge denied the defendant’s request. The judge assessed damages, judgment was entered and the defendant timely filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silkey v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Singer v. DeMartinoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API