Lamirand v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.
John Lamirand appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct erroneous sentence. Lamirand raises a single issue for our review, which we rephrase as whether the trial court had authority under Ind. Code § 35-50-l-2(a) to impose a consecutive sentence. We reverse and remand.
The facts pertinent to the present appeal are as follows. In March, 1989, Lami-rand committed an act of child molestation. Based on that offense, in May, 1990, Lami-rand was sentenced to eight years in the Indiana Department of Correction following his guilty plea to child molesting as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kendrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Shippen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Seay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Baromich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Bartruff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weaver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Newsome v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Badger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Badger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Jennifer Rose Peverly v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.