Legal Opinion

Guyot v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 1981No. A 7712-18554, CA 17531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from summary judgments for the defendants in this action for abuse of process, conspiracy to defraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm.

In February, 1973, the defendant Callas, then public guardian of defendant Multnomah County, was appointed by the probate department of the circuit court as temporary guardian of plaintiffs estate. (We will use the term "conservator” of the estate, in keeping with current statutory usage.) In June of that year, Callas petitioned to make the appointment permanent, and the petition was allowed by the court’s order of October…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lane v. BallOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Richards v. Page Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bradford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'FALLON v. PollardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rothenberg v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  3. LUCHINI BY AND THROUGH LUCHINI v. HarsanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Roberts v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API