Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Grace Carpet Mills, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided November 24, 1980No. Civ. A. No. C79-865APublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.

Now before the court is a motion of Barbara Pearson styled “Motion to Intervene or, Alternatively, Motion to be Substituted as Party Plaintiff.” In short, Barbara Pearson claims to be the lawful widow of Lawrence Pearson, supplanting Mrs. Ruth L. Pearson, plaintiff in this action, who seeks to recover for Pearson’s death. The facts alleged in Barbara Pearson’s motion are briefly as follows: That she married Pearson in England, June 22, 1962; that there were two children of the marriage; that on August 14, 1968, she and Lawrence executed in New York a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Wilkinson v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Crowe v. CroweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Guess v. GuessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API