Legal Opinion

Hines v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 21, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

— Reversing.

Claiming that while engaged in lifting steel rails for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, he suffered a hernia, which was due to the negligence of the company in failing to furnish a sufficient force to do the work, plaintiff, George Cox, brought suit .against the Director General of Railroads to recover damages. From a verdict and judgment in his favor for $1,000.00, the defendant appeals.. • • •/>

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff was fifty years of age and was working for the company as a section hand. Though he had worked in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stenvog v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DeAtleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Illinois Central R. R. v. LanganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co. v. TackittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Haywood v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stewart's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Tosh v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Kempe v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. MusicCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API