United States v. Angela Nolan-Cooper
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
In United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir.1978), we sustained a defendant’s claim that the government’s investigatory misconduct was so egregious that the due process clause demanded dismissal of the indictment against him. This holding was predicated on a pair of Supreme Court cases that appeared to recognize such a defense, United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973), and Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484, 96 S.Ct. 1646, 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976). In contrast to some other circuits which have never recognized…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Luis Humberto BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. William F. HelblingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.