Burns v. South Carolina
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAWKINS, District Judge.
This pro se habeas corpus petition is before the court on the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and incorporated herein by reference. The petitioner has objected to the Magistrate’s recommendation, and this court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Magistrate’s recommendation to which specific objection is made. Further, it may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate, or recommit the matter to the Magistrate with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Word v. North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Troy E. Marks v. John D. Rees and Linley Pearson, Attorney General of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- St. John v. SargentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983