Stockle v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim. The petitioners failed to provide a reasonable excuse for their failure to serve a timely notice of claim (see Matter of Blanco v City of New York, 78 AD3d 1048 [2010]; Matter of Felice v Eastport/South Manor Cent. School Dist., 50 AD3d 138, 150 [2008]), and the infancy of one of the petitioners, without any showing of a nexus between the infancy and the delay, was insufficient to constitute a reasonable excuse (see Robertson v *963Somers Cent. School Dist., 90 AD3d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rivera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Blanco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Tonissen v. Huntington U.F.S.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cuffee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Unique Wooden v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016