Legal Opinion

Currituck Grain Inc. v. Powell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1978No. 771DC880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant’s first assignment of error is that the district court erred in not granting his motion for a directed verdict and for a judgment n.o.v. The defendant contends that the evidence met the test as laid down by this Court in its previous opinion so that as a matter of law he was not a merchant at the time the alleged contract was made. He contends that the evidence shows he had never negotiated a grain contract prior to 1974, that he had never sold any grain or soybeans prior to that time and that he had no knowledge of the customs and practices of the marketing of grain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sierens v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Decatur Cooperative Association v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Cook Grains v. FallisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Lish v. ComptonUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sand Seed Service, Inc. v. PoeckesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sebasty v. PerschkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Brooks Cotton Company, Inc. v. Bradley F. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  3. Fred J. Moore, Inc. v. SchinmannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Goldkist, Inc. v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Wake County v. hotels.com, LpNorth Carolina Business Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API