SAIF Corp. v. Batey
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
SAIF seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order awarding claimant a 25 percent penalty under ORS 656.262(ll)(a), and attorney fees under ORS 656.382(1) (1995) and ORS 656.386(1) (1995). We affirm.
In October 1994, claimant sought treatment for pain in her right wrist and arm. In November 1994, she filed a workers’ compensation claim alleging an injury date of September 28, 1994. SAIF accepted her claim for “overuse syndrome” as nondisabling. In August 1995, claimant requested that SAIF reclassify the claim to disabling on the ground that she had become entitled to temporary disability…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Jones v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Oliver v. Norstar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Britton v. Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. BalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- SAIF Corp. v. BateyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998