Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 11, 1959No. 63-57PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Continental Casualty Company, wrote payment and performance bonds as surety for Pennsylvania Drydock and Shipbuilding Co., Inc., on contracts which the latter company had with the United States. Pennsylvania Drydock went into bankruptcy leaving unpaid bills incurred in its performance of the contracts. The plaintiff paid those bills pursuant to its obligation on its bonds. The United States has not paid Pennsylvania Drydock all that that company was entitled to under its contracts.

The plaintiff brought this suit against the United States alleging that it had paid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
  3. National Surety Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Argonaut Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Argonaut Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API