Legal Opinion

Posada v. Schomig

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 2, 1999No. 2:99-cv-02007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McCUSKEY, District Judge.

On January 22, 1999, Petitioner, Diego Posada, was allowed to file his petition for a writ of. habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 without prepayment of fees and costs (#4). On February 25, 1999, Respondent, James W. Schomig, filed a Motion to Dismiss (#7). Petitioner filed his Answer to the Motion to Dismiss (# 11) on June 25, 1999. This court agrees with Respondent that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was not timely filed. Accordingly, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (# 7) is GRANTED.

FACTS

On February 19, 1993, Petitioner pleaded guilty to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Randall Gendron v. United States of America, Randall Gendron v. United States of America, James P. Glass v. Rodney J. AhitowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Darnell Tinker v. Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. McClainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. People v. HeirensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunker v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. United States v. CookDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  3. United States Ex Rel. Ford v. PageDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  4. Higgins v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Martin v. BartowDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API