Apollo Fuel Oil v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MANN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Apollo Fuel Oil (“plaintiff’ or “Apollo”) brought this taxpayer’s suit for a refund of a $1,000 penalty assessed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) upon finding that plaintiff had used a non-taxable fuel oil for taxable purposes. With the parties’ consent, the case was tried before this Court on November 24, 1998. Based on the evidence adduced, the Court sustains the assessment of the penalty and directs that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant United States of America (“defendant” or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Raul Llorente v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.