Medtronic, Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NOEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on the 30th of January, 1995 for a hearing on plaintiffs motion to compel testimony and production of documents regarding defendant Intermedies’ interpretation and understanding of a 1988 settlement agreement.
I. The Parties’ Positions
Plaintiff Medtronic (“Medtronic”) asserts that defendant Intermedies (“Intermedies”) has, through its pleadings, put its interpretation and understanding of a 1988 Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) between the parties at issue. However, Intermedies has refused to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. MestreDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- Bieter Co. v. BlomquistDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Harter v. University of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Union County v. Piper Jaffray & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2008
- Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.