Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 2005No. S04A1718PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

Appellant Antwane Robinson appeals his convictions for murder and armed robbery, 1 claiming that the trial court committed several errors requiring reversal and that trial counsel was ineffective. Having reviewed the record, we conclude the trial court properly admitted appellant’s pre- and post-arrest statements, properly oversaw jury selection, and properly charged the jury on theories relevant to the evidence. We also conclude that the evidence was sufficient and that trial counsel was not ineffective. Therefore, we affirm.

The evidence of record shows that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Metts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. State v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. John Zambetti v. Cheeley Investments, L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API