Legal Opinion

Weco Products Co. v. Milton Ray Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1944No. 4880PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Axipellant-applicant applied in the United States Patent Office for registration of its trade-mark .“VR AY” for dentifrices. Appellee opposed the registration, showing prior use of the term “DR. RAY”, written in slanting script across the representation of a black and white target, for goods some of which were identical — dentifrices.

The Examiner of Trade-mark Interferences sustained the opposition and adjudged that the appellant was not entitled to registration of its mark; and upon appeal to the Commissioner of Patents, the examiner’s decision was affirmed (56 USPQ 236). Appellant has here…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Franco-Italian Packing Corp. v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. William S. Merrell Co. v. Anacin Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. Parke, Davis & Co. v. G. F. Harvey Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Wembley, Inc. v. Diplomat Tie CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  3. Burton-Dixie Corporation v. Restonic CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Chicago Dietetic Supply House, Inc. v. Perkins Products Company (General Foods Corporation, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API