Weco Products Co. v. Milton Ray Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
Axipellant-applicant applied in the United States Patent Office for registration of its trade-mark .“VR AY” for dentifrices. Appellee opposed the registration, showing prior use of the term “DR. RAY”, written in slanting script across the representation of a black and white target, for goods some of which were identical — dentifrices.
The Examiner of Trade-mark Interferences sustained the opposition and adjudged that the appellant was not entitled to registration of its mark; and upon appeal to the Commissioner of Patents, the examiner’s decision was affirmed (56 USPQ 236). Appellant has here…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franco-Italian Packing Corp. v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- William S. Merrell Co. v. Anacin Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Parke, Davis & Co. v. G. F. Harvey Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Wembley, Inc. v. Diplomat Tie CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Burton-Dixie Corporation v. Restonic CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Chicago Dietetic Supply House, Inc. v. Perkins Products Company (General Foods Corporation, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.