Legal Opinion
Alliance Marana v. Groseclose
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 17, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0091PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
Plaintiffs/appellants Alliance Maraña and Ted Schlinkert appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants/appellees Maraña Town Clerk Sandra Groseclose and the Town of Maraña and intervenors/appellees RedHawk Maraña, L.L.C., and Rita Land Corporation in appellants’ action seeking to compel Groseclose to transmit referendum petitions to the Pima County Recorder for certification of signatures. Appellants argue that the trial court erred in ruling that they lacked standing because they were not citizens of the Town of Maraña and that the referendum petitions failed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Renck v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Flagstaff v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Windham Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Southwest Soil Remediation, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Robert Schalkenbach Foundation v. Lincoln Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.