Legal Opinion

Smith v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

Section 339 of the Code is in the following language: “ No ordinary shall engage, directly or indirectly, in the practice of law in his own, or in the name of another, as a partner, open or silent, or otherwise, in any cause or proceeding in his own court, or in another court of which his own court has, or has had or may have jurisdiction.”

The questions made by the record in this case arise out of the construction of the foregoing statute.

The ordinary of Crawford county being a practicing attorney at law, as such attorney' brought suit upon an administrator’s bond in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tatum v. Allison, Anderson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fentzka's Administrator v. Warwick Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Gulledge Bros. Lumber Co. v. Wenatchee Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Roberts v. McCollumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API