Legal Opinion

Rademacher v. Greenwich Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Caroline Eademacher against the Greenwich Insurance Company of the City of New York. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

Chapter 488 of the Laws of 1886 provides for a uniform policy of insurance, known as the “Standard” policy, and makes its use compulsory upon insurance companies. Such a policy the defendant issued to the plaintiff on wearing apparel and household goods, some of which, it is claimed, were totally, and some partially, damaged by a fire occurring on the 23d day of February, 1891. The policy contained the usual clauses to be found in standard policies, requiring the insured, if a fire occurred, to give immediate notice of any loss, and the further clause providing for an arbitration in the event…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Uhrig v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Goodwin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vernon Insurance v. MaitlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Stack v. GudgelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Wallingford v. KaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API