Bird v. Morrison
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ARPEAR PROM CIRCTJIT COURT, MILWAUKEE COUNTY. This action was commenced by a bill in chancery, before the adoption of the code, for an account among partners, and to dissolve the partnership.
Read the full summary
ARPEAR PROM CIRCTJIT COURT, MILWAUKEE COUNTY. This action was commenced by a bill in chancery, before the adoption of the code, for an account among partners, and to dissolve the partnership. After the hearing of the testimony on the main allegations of the bill, the court found as facts, that the co-partnership had been entered into, and conducted for some time in the mercantile business; that subsequently the business was extended to dealings in, and improvements of real estate; that certain lots of land in Madison had been contributed by the partners, and improvements made upon them; that…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Dixoh, C. J.
The motion must be denied. We consider this judgment so far final as to authorize the clerk of the circuit court to transmit to this court the original papers, unless he was directed by the circuit judge to make and send copies thereof, pursuant to chap. 139, Laws, 1859. No such direction having been given by. the circuit judge, the papers are properly here.
After the decision of the foregoing motion, Mr. Knapp, on the 21st of October, again moved this court to make an order that *553said appellants do execute an undertaking, as is required by law to be executed, in order…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bentley v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1850